Friday, January 18, 2008

Some New thoughts, and a Response from Senator Feinstein

I read somewhere (I think a comment to a post on reddit) that because it is likely no one of importance actually reads letters sent, it might be a good idea to send a postcard with a one-liner on it stating you position. Given the response from Senator Feinstein below, that may well be a great idea. Also, a fax might be a good idea as well, as there is a tangible piece of paper someone will have to pick up and record the contact info before they toss it in the trash.

Anyhow, here is the clueless response from Senator Feinstein's automatrons (note that is has absolutely nothing to do with the issue I wrote about):

Dear Mr. Pyle:

Thank you writing about changes to media ownership rules. I appreciate hearing from you.

The effects of allowing a smaller number of companies a larger share of the media market concerns me. Any loosening of media ownership rules could seriously impact both the structure of the media sector and the relative negotiating power of individual companies. I am concerned that deregulation will put more power into the hands of media conglomerates, which could lead to neglect of local programming, eliminate competition, and reduce diversity of programming in the broadcast industry.

I have introduced legislation with Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) which would force the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to postpone any changes to media ownership rules until it takes steps to promote the broadcast and carriage of local programming by broadcasters, and to increase independent women and minority ownership representation. It would also require the FCC to wait at least 90 days before voting on a proposed rule change and to provide at least 60 days for public comment on it.

Please know I pay close attention to all proposed changes to media ownership rules and I will do what I can to ensure a competitive, pro-consumer marketplace. If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call my Washington, D.C. staff at (202) 224-3841. Best regards.


Sincerely yours, Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator

Thursday, January 3, 2008

New Letters for the New Year

The Cheney impeachment issue is something that s not going away, and in my opinion, ought to be considered on its merits. Unfortunately, the powers that be (Pelosi et al.) are acting to stifle any consideration of the merits, regardless of illegality or the very real potential of further illegal administration activity. I guess the salient point is that the allegations leveled in H.R. 333, sponsored by Dennis Kucinich, are supported by credible evidence, and the Democrat-controlled House steadfastly refuses to even hold hearings on the issue.

In an effort to show our "leaders" where the population stands on this issue, I have written the following two letters; one to my Congresswoman, Susan Davis, and the other to Congressman Conyers, the proverbial gatekeeper on the hearings issue. Enjoy!

Jim

January 3, 2008

VIA FACSIMILE ONLY

Congresswoman Susan Davis

4305 University Avenue
Suite 515
San Diego, CA 92105
Phone: (619) 280-5353
Fax: (619) 280-5311

U.S. House of Representatives
1526 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-2040
Fax: (202) 225-2948

Dear Congresswoman Davis,

I wanted to take a minute to thank you for your action in co-sponsoring House Joint Resolution no. 64, clarifying that President Bush does not have authority to go to war with Iran. As I am sure you would agree, the last thing this country needs is another ill-conceived war based upon hyped misinformation. As the recent National Intelligence Estimate shows, Bush administration rhetoric far outpaced any actual threat posed by Iran. Your leadership in signing on to this bill as a co-sponsor is greatly appreciated!

I am also writing to request that you support H.R. 333 regarding the impeachment of Richard. B. Cheney. To briefly summarize, the bill charges the Cheney 1) misled Congress and the American people about the threat of Iraq’s alleged WMDs, 2) misled Congress and the American people by hyping a false Iraq-Al Qaeda link, and 3) hyped a false Iranian threat in an effort to drum up support for yet another disastrous war. Although this bill has been banished to committee in hopes that it will die a quiet death, the American people deserve better.

I’ve heard many reasons why impeachment would purportedly be unwise. However, I have yet to hear any credible argument that the allegations leveled against Cheney are untrue, or that these crimes would not support impeachment. I recognize that you are not a member of the judiciary committee, but that is not to say that you are powerless in this matter. You could sign on as a co-sponsor, and more importantly, you could formally request that Congressman Conyers to hold hearings on the bill. I understand that your support may not tip the scales in favor of hearings on this bill, but to say and do nothing will achieve nothing.

Sincerely,

James H. Pyle



January 3, 2008

VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL

Congressman John Conyers, Jr.

2426 Rayburn Building

Washington, DC 20515

(202) 225-5126

(202) 225-0072 Fax

Dear Congressmen Conyers,

Although I am not a resident of your district, I wanted to write and thank you for your efforts in opposing the Iraq war, and for introducing House Resolution Nos. 635 (to create a select committee to investigate the run-up to the Iraq war), 636 (to censure President Bush), 637 (to censure Vice-President Cheney), and 3541 (to affirm America’s rejection of torture). Each of these bills show that you stand for the rule of law.

Unfortunately, every one of the above-referenced bills was referred to committee, where it died a silent death. Accordingly, I was surprised and dismayed to learn that you, as chair of the House Judiciary Committee, have sentenced H.R. 333, relating to the impeachment of Vice-President Cheney, to die a quiet death.

As I read the December 20, 2007 transcript of your interview with Amy Goodman, my disappointment turned to outrage. Your explanation as to why you will not hold hearings on the bill is not that the allegations lack merit, or that misleading the country into war is not an impeachable offense. Rather, your explanation seems to be that it is a large task to be accomplished in a relatively short amount of time, and that it won’t play well on the news, thereby hindering the electoral chances of the Democratic party. These are unsatisfactory excuses.

Though I have no doubt that Speaker Pelosi and the Democratic leadership have applied an enormous amount of pressure to keep the lid on this bill, it is against the will of the American people. In a recent survey by the American Research Group, 54% of those surveyed support the impeachment of Dick Cheney. Given Congress’ current approval rating of 32%, Americans are not impressed by what they see from Congress today.

The irony here is that despite your efforts to establish a committee to look into the misinformation campaign by the Bush administration leading to the Iraq war, you now have the power to hold hearings on this very issue. Instead of sending a message through censure, you could shine the disinfecting light of public discourse on the administration’s lies. That you now choose to shrink from the challenge facing you speaks volumes, and casts your earlier efforts in a light that shows them as feigned outrage calculated to score political points. Please do the right thing and hold hearings on this important issue.

Sincerely,

James H. Pyle

Thursday, December 20, 2007

First entry

I am a political neophyte that has been empowered by the internet. I was inspired by the successful efforts of bloggers to stop the new FISA legislation with the telecom immunity provision, and have been convinced that it is my civic duty to let my elected representatives know where I stand on important issues. Rather than simply bitch to my friends, I think it prudent to voice my opinions to the people that have the power to make a difference. I think everyone should do the same. Accordingly, from now on I am posting the letters I write to elected representatives so that others looking for a starting point can simply cut and paste my letters into their own, and tailor them as desired. Accordingly, the following is the text of an email I sent to Diane Feinstein today:

Dear Senator Feinstein,

Just a quick note to express my deep and sincere sadness and disappointment in your support of the Bush administration's efforts to quash any inquiry into its illegal wiretapping program. The telecom immunity provision in the new FISA bill shocks the conscious, as its goal is to give those who aided and abetted illegal spying on American citizens a free pass on their illegal, FOR-PROFIT, activity. It is hard to imagine how rewarding the wrongdoers would provide any incentive for others to stand as a bulwark against overreaching executive power. American citizens, including your constituents, are paying attention to this issue, and they are sickened by your efforts as a shill for the Bush administration.

My understanding is that you intend to retire after you current term expires. If so, then your lame duck status provides some insulation against the backlash of your constituents. However, such an end comes with a heavy toll, as you will be viewed NOT as a champion of the interests of your constituents, but as a corrupt cog in an oppressive machine. You legacy will not merely be tarnished, such as that which happens to aged silver, but rotted, decayed, and maggot-ridden, such as that which happens to hamburger left to spoil at the bottom of a trashcan.

As there is still time to correct your error, and undo any and all harm, you hold the power to still make a difference. Everyone errs, but it takes real courage to correct those mistakes. Supporting wrongdoing is indefensible. I strongly urge you to stand on the right side of this issue.

Sincerely,


James H. Pyle